The Negotiation Of TPP Is Difficult, And The Deliberations Of Each Country Are Still Fruitless.

After the negotiations on the p Pacific Partnership Agreement (a href= "//www.sjfzxm.com/news/index_c.asp > TPP < /a"), which was held by the United States in 2008 P, the TPP negotiations have been held for more than 20 rounds, which lasted for nearly four years.

The new round of negotiations was originally scheduled for January this year and was postponed to February. Some people have to postpone when it will be difficult to predict.

The reason is that, in terms of intellectual property rights and the reduction of < a href= "//www.sjfzxm.com/news/index_c.asp" > tariff > /a >, the United States is in sharp opposition with other participating countries and is hard to reconcile.

< /p >

< p > Malaysia does not rule out the possibility of leaving the TPP negotiations.

First of all, there are many state-owned enterprises in Malaysia, especially large public enterprises, which are closely related to the government.

If reforms are carried out according to the requirements of the United States, many employees will lose their jobs.

Therefore, it is opposed to join the TPP force.

Secondly, former Prime Minister Mahathir stressed in the interview with the local media that "Malaysia's participation in TPP will affect trade relations with China" (China did not take part in TPP).

Many congressmen in Malaysia share the same view.

China (including Hongkong) is Malaysia's largest export market, and exports to China account for 17% of its total exports in 2012.

Since the financial crisis in 2008, Malaysia's exports to the US have continued to decline, while its dependence on China's exports has been rising.

Therefore, in the official document of the government of Malaysia, it was openly stated that "welcome China to participate in TPP".

< /p >

< p > the Malaysia government is also studying the pros and cons of joining TPP.

Participating in TPP "is to expand the" a href= "//www.sjfzxm.com/news/index_c.asp > trade < /a > with the United States and other countries. In the future, we need to see how the TPP changes China's attitude and" do not rule out the possibility of leaving the TPP negotiations ".

< /p >

< p > Japanese media believe that the purpose of Vietnam's participation in TPP negotiations is to contain China.

The advantage of Vietnam's participation in the TPP negotiations is that tariffs will increase exports of textiles to the United States.

However, there are many state-owned enterprises in Vietnam, and there are many restrictions on the introduction of foreign investment, which is also the cause of many foreign accusations.

In addition, Vietnam has many problems in terms of intellectual property rights, labor mobility, environment and competition policy. Therefore, Vietnamese Prime Minister Ranjig recently presented a meeting at the ASEAN and Japanese leaders meeting held in Japan, "TPP should deal with Vietnam's care for developing countries".

But in Vietnam, there was no objection to the voice of TPP. In late August last year, in the TPP negotiations in Brunei, Vietnamese officials announced publicly that "leaders have decided to take part in TPP".

The Japanese media believe that Vietnam can participate in TPP because it has disputes with China in the South China Sea.

< /p >

< p > Japan's participation in the a href= "//www.sjfzxm.com/news/index_c.asp" > TPP negotiation < /a > is for the benefit of dogs and horses.

According to Japan's Ministry of economy and industry, Japan's participation in TPP can earn 300 billion yen a year, but now Japan's tariff revenue is about 500 billion yen per year. This shows that after joining the TPP abolition of tariffs, the overall revenue will be negative.

In recent years, some scholars have put forward the conclusion that the economy and administration of Hokkaido, Okinawa and Kyushu will be bankrupt after joining TPP after nearly 3 months' calculation.

Therefore, participation in TPP will not bring positive benefits to Japan's economy.

Therefore, the right-wing Prime Minister Abe Shinzo said angrily: "it is not good to know that joining the TPP, but Japan needs the protection of the United States. Now it has both the Diaoyu Islands issue and the North Korean nuclear issue. The loss of joining the TPP is so great that we will not hesitate to consider it from the perspective of security."

This is, of course, an excuse. In fact, Japan needs to curry favor with the United States in order to revive militarism and to return to the Pacific for the US.

< /p >

< p > the Andouble administration, in accordance with President Obama's wishes, not only actively takes part in TPP negotiations, but also makes every effort to push forward the TPP negotiations as soon as possible.

Many areas of Japan's domestic economy do not have an advantage in international competition, especially in agricultural products.

So, when the Andouble administration announced its participation in the TPP negotiations last May, there was fierce opposition in the country.

The Andouble administration made a commitment to the mainland: five agricultural products (rice, wheat, dairy products, beef and pork, sugar) as an exception to the "holy land", not to reduce taxes, or at any time to withdraw from the TPP negotiations.

In August last year, Japan offered only 70% to 80% of the goods to be abolished, and five agricultural products (subdivided into 586 items) were deducted, and the rate of abolishing tariffs was only 93.5%.

According to Japanese media, even if Japan abolished all five agricultural products, the rate of liberalization could only reach 94.6%, far below the target level of the TPP tariff abolition of 98%.

Therefore, in the TPP negotiations, Canada, New Zealand and other countries unanimously accused Japan of "Abolishing tariff rates too low".

< /p >

Under the pressure of foreign tax reduction, P has to reintegrate the five agricultural products as "sacred territory" instead of reducing taxes. According to the impact of these commodities on the domestic industry and the import situation, Japan has made a new choice.

Decided to abolish customs duties on chocolate, biscuits, ox tongue and processed rice.

Exceptions to the five tariff items, such as wines, Japanese wines, some leather products, salt and tobacco, are excluded from the agenda.

Japanese imported wine is subject to customs duties. It is divided into 15% (125) by value, or by weight and litre.

The tariff of imported chocolate is 10%, the tariff of ox tongue is 13% - 20.4%, and the duty of leather is 15% - 20%.

According to Japanese participants in the TPP negotiations, Japanese imports of chocolate and ox tongue account for only about 10% of domestic demand. Therefore, "the abolition of tariffs on these two foreign products has limited impact on the domestic market".

< /p >

< p >, however, Nishikawa Koya, the chairman of the TPP negotiations of Japan's Liberal Democratic Party, told a meeting in November 1st last year that "the liberalization rate is 95% too high, absolutely not."

The government is required to give tariff protection to beans, chicken and aquatic products.

It can be seen that on the issue of tariffs, Andouble also encountered many troubles in the ruling Liberal Democratic Party of Japan.

< /p >