Group Buying Website "Ai Bang Net" Cheats Consumers &Nbsp; Selling Counterfeit Nike Shoes Is Not A Refund.

May 11th, it is reported that

The first reason is that the number of group buying is large, the number of group buying of 8500 people, the volume of nearly 10000 purchases of goods, and today's group buying website are numerous.

Miss li of Jiangsu and Mr. Wang of Hangzhou told us about their buying process last night.

Miss Li: on that day, I found the authentic Nike shoes of 128 yuan in the group buying, and it also promised to make a fake three and then mail it.

Mr. Wang: in April 29th, there was a group purchase on the love gang. The original price of Nike's shoes was 528, and the group purchase price was 128. At the time, it promised to make a fake three, and I also bought his group purchase before the love group, so I bought it without thinking.

The original price of more than 500 yuan brand shoes, now only sell 128 yuan, also marked the absolute quality, fake one three, plus love network in the group buying industry also has a certain reputation, so the strength to protect, do not want to sell hard, 8500 people purchase number, is the best explanation.

{page_break}

A few days later, some netizens received the express sent by the AI Gang, but the netizen who was delighted to open the package and try to wear it was foolish.

Ms. Liu, who lives in Jilin, described the situation at that time.

Miss Liu: the soles of the soles are everywhere. The holes in the shoelaces are particularly large. The signs of Nike are all crooked. They are not in the same direction at all. They do not need official staff to see them. We have to look at them ourselves. They are not as good as dozens of shoes sold on the stalls.

However, Liu said that the three false commitment on the web page no longer exists.

Miss Liu is lucky. She has received at least the fake shoes, and more netizens have not received anything except a short message.

The content of the message is to notify the buyer, because the supplier is insufficient, and the seller will refund the agreement.

Mr. Wang who lives in Hangzhou and miss Wan in Yancheng of Jiangsu share the same experience.

Miss Wan: I didn't receive any shoes, but I received a text message. I received it in May 5th. He said that he could not deliver Nike shoes in time because of insufficient stocking of merchants. In order to ensure my rights and interests, the refund process would be automatically started. I checked it in 3 to 5 days, but today it has actually been in May 10th.

The single, and then generally after the end of the delivery, but very strange in May 2nd which night received a day SMS, SMS said that our order has been negotiated refund, I did not refund the money, unilaterally gave me the order to cancel, and I let his group purchase website to ask questions, customer service has been ignored me, I said no longer answer my questions, I went to complain to you, they gave us a common problem similar questions to query, but inquired this little meaning, in May 2nd, he said 3 to 5 days to give me a refund period, but in May 10th to today, or goods have not received, the money has not returned, has been there. Mr. Wang: at that time, the order was placed at 8:31 pm on April 29th.

Ms. Liu faced with fake shoes and asked for help to return the goods. She was waiting for the refund, but faced with the promise of a three penalty on the webpage, she had doubts. Can the words on the webpage be credentials for her rights protection? Qiu Baochang, an expert consultant of the China Consumer Association, believes that the promise words on the webpage are like the contract words and have legal effect.

Qiu Baochang: to the audience, to the consumer has the pledge, the false one punishment ten, or the false one punishment three, once the condition has been established, is really false, should compensate three times, this kind of commitment law is the protection, has the legal effect.

If we say, because the supply is insufficient, the refund agreement with the buyer is reasonable.

However, more consumers do not even get a refund.

So, we spontaneously set up a group of QQ called group buying rights to safeguard their rights.

QQ group netizens told reporters that at present, more than 300 netizens did not receive a refund, and the number of people in fact is far more than this figure.

We no longer care about the fake three penalty from the webpage. We just want to get our shoes back.

{page_break}

Reporters call after sale calls, always no connection.

And some netizens have luckily called the customer service phone, but also just dial the phone, and no more.

QQ group of users: first to their website to make a complaint call, but more than 20 dozen have not been opened, and then I think this may involve a fraud.

QQ group netizens: when I hit the past, the first phone call was directly linked to me. When I made the second call, it was a female customer service. I said I would like to apply for a refund. She said yes, she said, tell your phone number, order number and the number of AI bang, tell her that she said yes, and that it will be done for me later.

Qiu Baochang, an expert consultant of China Consumer Association, believes that the behavior of websites has constituted commercial fraud.

Qiu Baochang: this website is a typical fraud from a civil point of view. It is a typical fraud. It is a typical fraud to counterfeit products by ordinary products. But if it reaches a certain level, our criminal law 140 clearly stipulates that 200 thousand of the sales amount should be investigated for criminal responsibility.

In many cases of online shopping fraud, victims often choose to swallow their money because they are too small to be cheated.

Professor Hong Daode of China University of Political Science and Law believes that the nature of fraud is not determined by a single amount, but rather by the total amount. The netizens should actively safeguard their rights.

Hong Daode: if you feel that the other party's cheating behavior is quite bad, you can't take it into account even if the amount is small. Instead, you should actively act to report this case to the local public security organ. One thing we should pay attention to is that when the public security organs decide whether a citizen is suspected of swindling a crime, it is not to see how much he deceives another person, but to see how much he has cheated, so that every cheated person can not be judged because of the amount he has been cheated, which is not conducive to our judicial organs' handling of suspected fraudulent offenders.